• Skip to main content

Michael Santos

The official website of crime fiction author Michael Santos.

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • BCP Journal
  • Articles
  • Contact

Michael Santos

Story Writing: External and Internal Conflicts

December 24, 2018 by Michael Santos

In this article, we talk about external and internal conflicts. Conflict drives story. Learn how to use your characters’ conscious wants and subconscious needs to write a killer story that both entertains readers and resonates with them on a deeper level.

Be sure to watch my YouTube video on this subject as well.

A tale of two conflicts.

In every story, you’ll find two main types of conflict that drive the two main types of narratives.

The external conflict drives the external narrative, which is the plot of the book. The internal conflict drives the internal narrative, the arc of a character from the beginning of their journey to the end.

The external conflict occurs when a character consciously wants something. They know that this is their objective, and their actions in the story are fueled by this desire. Conflict occurs when some external obstacle prevents them from reaching that objective.

In short, this conflict creates the situation, or plot, of the novel.

The internal conflict occurs when a character subconsciously needs something. This implies that the character may not know what their internal objective is. Often, they must endure the trials and tribulations of the external conflict in order to learn that what they needed all along was different from what they wanted.

In short, this conflict creates a character’s arc and development as they experience internal change.

The internal narrative is also the element of the story that connects to the reader on a human level. We may find plot intellectually interesting and entertaining, but it is the character’s internal struggle that we relate to most. We can deeply empathize with coming of age stories, tales of redemption, and crises of identity (all viable internal conflicts) because they’re universal in real life.

These narratives make us feel more invested in the characters, which in turn, makes us more invested in the external narrative, as we watch to see what happens to these relatable fictional people next.

For my money, the best stories balance the impacts of the external and internal conflicts.

What does this mean for different writers?

How do we practically apply these principles to our writing, especially in various genres?

Conflict in commercial fiction.

In commercial fiction (such as the popular genres), the external conflict is prioritized, while the internal conflict becomes a major subplot that enhances our experience with the plot. The situation of the story is the main attraction for the reader. Meanwhile, the characters’ internal conflicts add to the stakes of the plot and make us care deeply about the resolution.

For example, a homicide detective consciously wants to catch a killer in the external conflict. This forms the plot of the book, as the investigation is the main attraction. But perhaps this case is personal, because symbolically, if the detective catches the murderer, she’ll redeem herself from a terrible mistake she made in her past.

That internal redemption story adds another layer of stakes to the case, while at the same time connecting us to the detective at a human level.

So, the external narrative is the priority, but a compelling internal narrative is crucial to the successful execution of the plot.

To put it another way, in commercial fiction, the best plot means nothing without a significant internal story to give it emotional weight.

For more information about using external and internal conflicts in crime fiction, read my post on how to write suspenseful thrillers!

Conflict in literary fiction.

Meanwhile, literary fiction prioritizes the internal narrative. The main attraction for a literary reader is the character’s change over the course of the novel. The external narrative provides the context and catalyst for that change.

For example, is To Kill a Mockingbird a legal thriller in which our focus is on Atticus and his court case? Or is it a coming of age story about Scout? Remember that a coming of age narrative is internal, because it tells us how a character develops within the context of external situations.

Is The Great Gatsby about Gatsby and whether or not he gets the girl and survives the mob? Or is it about Nick and his internal change?

Of course, there is plenty of cross-over between these two generalized explanations of external and internal narratives in literary and commercial fiction. There are commercial books that prioritize the internal and literary books with strong external plots.

The crucial point here is that a great writer will be able to use both types of conflict to achieve different effects, depending on their goals for any given project.

A note on point of view.

One interesting observation I’ll share is that you can often pinpoint which narrative is prioritized in a book by examining the point of view character.

In a commercial novel, the story is usually told by the character at the center of the external conflict. In a literary novel, your POV character is typically the person at the heart of the internal conflict.

This makes sense, because in both cases, the reader spends the most time with the character who has the most to gain or lose in the conflict that is the most interesting in that type of fiction.

Back to our examples.

Let’s go back to the To Kill a Mockingbird example and compare that novel to the legal thrillers of today. Scout is at the center of the coming of age story. The essential questions the reader asks in that conflict focus on what kind of person Scout will become after experiencing the story. It’s logical, then, that the narrative will be most engaging from Scout’s point of view, and not from another character’s.

However, if you look at John Grisham’s thriller A Time to Kill, you’ll find that the protagonist, Jake Brigance, is a defense attorney at the center of the major external conflict of the book. The central questions of the novel revolve around his court case, so Jake’s perspective is the most interesting for the reader.

The other key point I’ll emphasize here is that, in both books, the authors balance the external and internal narratives well, even as they prioritize one or the other. Both arcs are important in the story, making these works impactful on deeper levels for the reader.

Summary.

Okay, let’s review.

  1. External conflict occurs when an external obstacle prevents a character from getting what they consciously want.
  2. Internal conflict occurs when a character subconsciously needs something, but doesn’t yet know it.
  3. The external conflict drives the external narrative, the plot. The internal conflict drives the internal narrative, the character’s arc.
  4. Commercial fiction prioritizes the external narrative and uses the internal narrative to raise the stakes. Literary fiction prioritizes the internal narrative and uses the external narrative as the catalyst for the protagonist’s change.
  5. In commercial fiction, the POV character is often the person at the center of the external conflict. In literary fiction, the POV character is often the person at the center of the internal conflict.

If you enjoyed this post and found it helpful, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: books, how to write a book, writing

How to Write a Mystery: It’s All a Game

December 22, 2018 by Michael Santos

In this article, we discuss how to write a mystery novel, one of the most popular forms of crime fiction on the market. How do the mechanics of these books work to engage readers? How do we create a compelling puzzle that holds the reader’s attention?

You can also watch my YouTube video on writing mysteries.

Let’s go back to school.

Do you remember learning about analogies in school? When I was in fifth grade, there was this competition called Wordly Wise, in which every student had to participate. They’d give us a long sheet of paper with a list of analogies. One of the words would be left blank, and we’d have to pick the right answer from a list of four choices.

Each analogy would be written in this classic formatting…

a : b :: x : y

The single colon means “is to”. The double colon means “as”.

breeze : gale :: trickle : ______.

a) lull b) plunder c) cascade d) sunshine

The correct answer is C. Analogies create associations between pairings of words. A breeze is a smaller amount of wind compared to a gale, just as a trickle is a smaller amount of liquid compared to a cascade.

So, what does that have to do with writing mystery stories?

The game is afoot.

Everything. A mystery novel is really a game between the reader and the writer, and the mechanics of the gameplay are built from an analogy.

In a mystery, the protagonist is typically the investigator character, while the main antagonist is usually the person at the center of the case…the perpetrator who planned the crime, committed it, and now toils to keep the facts hidden.

The investigator pursues the truth one clue at a time, in an effort to sift through the red herrings and catch the criminal. Pretty straightforward, right? You can probably recall several books that use the framework I just described.

Here’s the trick: just as the fictional story is a game between the investigator and the perpetrator, the reading experience is a game between the reader and the writer. In other words…

reader : investigator :: writer : perpetrator

Mystery novels are proxy warfare.

What is the reader’s role in the reading experience? They enter the novel knowing none of the information they need to solve the puzzle. They’re typically shown a crime scene in an early chapter, perhaps at the very beginning. There they find the first clues that set them on the path to discovering the truth. But it’s not until the end that they have enough information to solve the case.

Additionally, because mystery novels are most often set in the point of view of the investigator character, the reader typically receives that information at the same pace and from the same perspective as their fictional counterpart.

That is, the investigator is the reader’s proxy in the story. Their experiences mirror each other, and the reader “lives” through that character as they both work through the puzzle. The investigator and the reader both want the same answers.

The investigator is the reader’s game piece.

But how about the writer’s role? The mystery author plans the puzzle, executes the crime (typically before the beginning of the narrative or right at the beginning), and then keeps the answers hidden until close to the end, when it’s time for the reader to make a guess…and time for the showdown between the investigator and perpetrator.

Sound familiar? It should remind you of how we described the perpetrator’s role in the fictional story.

The perpetrator is the writer’s proxy. It is through the villain that the writer spins the web of information, manages the reader’s experience acquiring that information, and pays off the entire case with the revelation of the answers at the story’s conclusion.

The perpetrator and the writer have the solution that the investigator and the reader want, so the perpetrator is the writer’s game piece.

The rules of play.

The experience of a mystery novel relies on this game between reader and writer. As with any fun game, however, there are rules.

  1. The reader has until the end of the book to solve the puzzle. Solving the mystery is the experience that they’re buying, but there is a time limit on that experience. What makes this genre so addicting and so ripe for successful series is that when the reader solves one book’s puzzle, they’ll want more.
  2. The writer must exercise “fair play”, one of the most important terms in mystery writing. That is, the reader must have all the information they require to solve the puzzle before the big reveal at the end. An author can’t present a random, convenient clue that changes the mystery at the last second, for the sake of adding another twist. I’ve read a few books by authors who commit that sin, and there is nothing more frustrating than to reach a conclusion based on the evidence, only to have the rug pulled out from under you.
  3. The puzzle must be challenging. This is especially true because avid mystery novel fans are VERY good at this game. The writer must play fair, but fair doesn’t mean easy. The author should use misdirection, red herrings, and vibrant casts of potentially guilty characters to send their readers (and their investigators) chasing after multiple leads at any given time.

Summary.

  1. A mystery is a game between the reader and the writer, in which the reader has to solve the puzzle by collecting and analyzing information created, managed, and revealed by the writer.
  2. The investigator is the reader’s proxy in the story, and the perpetrator is the writer’s proxy. The reader experiences the game through the investigator’s eyes, and the writer experiences the game through the perpetrator’s eyes.
  3. The writer must play fair by ensuring that the reader has all the information they need to solve the puzzle before the answer is revealed.

I recommend going back and reading the Sherlock Holmes stories. It’s no coincidence that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle had his hero say, “The game is afoot!” He used these mechanics to perfection, and it’s the reason his fiction remains the model for popular mysteries today, from books to TV crime dramas.

Another recommendation I have is Hour Game, by David Baldacci. This is my favorite serial killer mystery, because Baldacci manages the reader’s experience with the puzzle so well.

To see a book that I feel doesn’t play fair, read Michael Connelly’s The Poet. Don’t get me wrong, Connelly is perhaps the greatest mystery author of his generation, and The Poet is a brilliant novel in every other way. But when I reached the end, I felt that the last twist broke the fair play rule. See if you agree!

Understanding this relationship (reader : investigator :: writer : villain) is the key to writing a killer mystery.

If you enjoyed this post and found it helpful, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: crime fiction, how to write a book, how to write a mystery

How to Write a Thriller: The Keys to Suspenseful Writing

December 22, 2018 by Michael Santos

In this article, we begin discussing thriller novels by talking about suspense. How do we create suspense? How does it work within a crime novel to create a satisfying experience for readers?

Be sure to watch my YouTube video on this subject as well.

It’s all about mood.

The label “thriller” encompasses a wide variety of fiction. In terms of popular genres, you’re likely familiar with legal thrillers, psychological thrillers, historical thrillers, and many more.

It is one of the most versatile types of book, because any story can contain elements of a thriller. That is to say, any story can be thrilling. As a result, they are incredibly fun to write, because thriller authors have a great deal of freedom in terms of subject matter, story structure, and the mechanics of the creative writing craft.

The key to every thriller is having the right mood, which demands that you create suspense for the reader.

How do we write with suspense?

I define good suspense as a combination of excitement and apprehension. I want to be desperate to know what happens next in the book, but I also want to experience a sense of dread.

You have to make the reader worry about the outcome of the story. Each new plot point has to change the game in such a way that the reader says, “Uh-oh, now what?” You should make your reader hope for a happy ending but fear impending doom for the characters.

The narrative in a thriller is built on layers of twists and turns that create both excitement and apprehension. Each layer changes the status quo in such a way that the reader senses the tension building, which makes them wonder when that tension will become too much. They instinctively know that the story can’t go on like that forever.

These layers build to an ending that pays off those feelings, arguably the most important part of a thriller–the end is the most cathartic stage of the reading experience, when the emotions are at their peak.

Writing with suspense entails creating, managing, and escalating that sense of impending disaster, as the narrative progresses from its inciting incident to the climax, at which point the protagonist’s life will be irrevocably changed.

There will either be a happy ending (what the reader hopes for), a negative ending (what the reader dreads), or a mix of the two. Perhaps an FBI agent catches the serial killer, but must compromise her personal values and identity to do so. Those complicated resolutions are the ones that will resonate with readers the most, because they keep you thinking long after you finish the novel.

The resolution in a thriller must be both surprising and inevitable. It must shock the reader. At the same time, when the reader considers the story in retrospect, the ending must make complete sense. With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, they should feel like they should have seen the end coming all along.

Thrillers are built on hope.

To write a compelling thriller, you must manage the reader’s hope and fear. But how?

One of my favorite techniques is dramatic irony, when the reader knows more than the characters.

The most common example of this is found in horror movies, when a clueless character goes down into the dark basement. The viewer knows that the monster is down there, ready to rip asunder the poor soul’s head. But the character believes they’re making the right decision.

This creates a powerful sense of impending doom. We hope that they survive, but we dread the likely possibility that we’ll be saying goodbye to this character in a matter of seconds.

Another example…

In my first novel, No Hard Feelings, my protagonist–a hit man named The Apostle–believes the woman he’s seeing has betrayed him to the police and to a group of criminals, who want revenge for a crime he committed against them.

Chapter 11 opens with the woman–Eve–driving home from a date with another man, a detective no less. She’s feeling positive after meeting with him. The next scene shows The Apostle breaking into her apartment, where he plans to confront her about her alleged treachery. He’s irate, hurt, and desperate. And he’s a professional killer.

Eve has no idea that he’s waiting for her, but the reader does.

When you get to that scene, you hope that their encounter will end peaceably. But you dread more negative outcomes.

That’s how dramatic irony works. It plays on the reader’s hope and fear.

Hope is built on good characterization.

It is essential that your reader connects with the characters for this to work. It is required, or your thriller will be less than satisfactory and contain no emotional power whatsoever.

Read It, by Stephen King–a masterpiece of characterization. We get to know the Losers’ Club by seeing the intricacies of their dreams, apprehensions, and lives as both children and adults. The horror plot points in the novel are compelling and terrifying, because we become close enough to the characters for us to feel their dread along with them.

We hope and fear because they do, and King’s skill in creating and developing engaging characters is the key to that.

How to write characters that resonate with readers.

This subject is worthy of its own post (or series of posts), but I’ll keep it simple in this article.

Thrillers are known for their action-packed plots. In any story, there is an external narrative and an internal narrative. The thriller genre is driven by the external; that is, the events of the story–the conflict surrounding the characters.

But it’s the internal narrative, the conflict within the characters, that binds the reader to them on a human level. The internal conflict speaks to a human experience that we’ve all had or will have.

What makes this even more interesting is that it’s common for the reader to know what a character’s internal conflict is…but often the character does not. They typically learn it by the end, in a moment of revelation. “I thought I wanted x, but I needed y all along.”

The internal narrative also enhances our experience with the external narrative, because it adds to the plot’s stakes.

For example, let’s go back to that FBI agent/serial killer bit. The agent’s external objective is straight-forward: they want to solve the case. The plot of the novel will be built on that objective, as we follow the agent’s progress.

But what about the internal objective? Perhaps the FBI agent must solve this case to make up for some horrible thing they did in their past. Now the stakes are much higher. It’s not just a story about stopping a serial killer. The protagonist’s entire sense of self and subconscious journey for redemption now rides on the outcome of the case.

We’ve all experienced a time in life when we sought redemption, so we relate to that story. We hope that it resolves in the agent’s favor, because if they can find redemption, surely so can we. But we dread the negative ending, because we feel the same doom as the character.

For more information about external and internal conflicts, read the full article on how to use them effectively in your story writing.

Back to No Hard Feelings.

In my novel, The Apostle faces two tremendous conflicts in the scene where he breaks into Eve’s apartment.

The external conflict: he’s on the run from the police and a gang, and the woman he loves may have sold him out. The internal conflict: his father used to mercilessly beat him as a punishment. He became a hit man, a professional murderer, so that he would always be the most dangerous person in the room. So that no one could ever hurt him again.

The fact that the woman he loves is likely hurting him is too much for him to handle. It brings him back to his childhood, when another loved one caused him emotional (and physical) pain. He constructed his whole adult persona to avoid such torture, and now that persona is failing him.

He must find the truth about Eve for the sake of his sense of self, his identity, and his ability to find peace. All of which adds to the stakes of the external events in the chapter.

Because of that strong internal narrative, the reader feels connected to him and is more invested in the outcome of the scene. On top of that, the reader has spent enough time with Eve by this point in the story (chapter 11, remember) to know what her internal conflicts are.

When the two characters are in a scene of conflict together, the reader desperately hopes they’ll find happiness, while also dreading the opposite. In short, the chapter is suspenseful because it resonates with the reader on a human level.

Summary.

Okay, let’s review. To write a good thriller:

  1. You must write with suspense.
  2. Suspense is a combination of excitement and apprehension, hope and fear.
  3. Dramatic irony is a great technique for creating suspense.
  4. You must get your readers to connect with your characters for them to feel hope and fear.
  5. To make that happen, write compelling internal narratives that add to the stakes of your plots.

If you enjoyed this post and found it helpful, please share it!

Subscribe to my author newsletter for a free book and more writing and crime fiction content!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: creative writing, crime fiction, how to write a book, how to write a thriller, how to write crime fiction, no hard feelings, suspense novels, thriller novels

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Copyright © 2025 · Author Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in