• Skip to main content

Michael Santos

The official website of crime fiction author Michael Santos.

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • BCP Journal
  • Articles
  • Contact

how to write crime fiction

The FBI, ATF, DEA, and US Marshals: Federal Agencies for Writers

January 21, 2019 by Michael Santos

One of the key challenges of writing crime fiction is getting your facts straight. While every story requires artistic liberties, such as cutting the duller moments of a cop’s job (i.e. the paperwork), readers in this genre expect that authors understand the most important details of crime and law enforcement.

Many amateur authors make the mistake of using the wrong agencies in their stories. For instance, having the FBI investigate a local murder, which would actually be the jurisdiction of local authorities. Or having ATF chase a fugitive with a drug charge. The U.S. Marshals apprehend wanted fugitives, and the DEA is the federal agency created to fight the war on drugs.

In this article, I’ll give you a rundown of the most commonly referenced federal law enforcement agencies so you can get it right.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

The FBI is a popular choice for crime writers, especially in the serial killer thriller sub-genre. If you’re writing about the Bureau, here’s what you need to know:

  1. It is the principal federal law enforcement agency of the United States. The Bureau operates under the jurisdiction of the US Department of Justice and reports to the US Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence.
  2. It does NOT work local cases, which fall to state, municipal, and county departments.
  3. Its wide variety of duties encompass national security and criminal investigation responsibilities that include: anti-terrorism operations, defending the US from foreign intelligence, stopping cyber attacks and crimes, combating corruption, defending civil rights, fighting national and transnational criminal organizations (such as the infamous LCN), combating white-collar crime, and supporting law enforcement partners (such as on task forces).
  4. It has 56 field offices in major US cities, as well as 60 Legal Attaches (called LEGATs) at US embassies in foreign countries. Those offices primarily coordinate with international law enforcement, rather than conduct operations in other nations.

The Organization

The FBI has a myriad of branches. Click each of these links for more information.

  • Intelligence Branch
  • National Security Branch
  • Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch
  • Science and Technology Branch
  • Information and Technology Branch
  • Human Resources Branch

Rank Structure

Field Agents

  • New Agent Trainee
  • Special Agent
  • Senior Special Agent
  • Supervisory Special Agent
  • Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge (ASAC)
  • Special Agent-in-Charge (SAC)

FBI Management

  • Deputy Assistant Director
  • Assistant Director
  • Associate Executive Assistant Director
  • Executive Assistant Director
  • Associate Deputy Director
  • Deputy Chief of Staff
  • Chief of Staff and Special Counsel to the Director
  • Deputy Director
  • Director

Duty Weapons

FBI Special Agents are issued the Glock 22 or 23 semi-automatic handgun, chambered in the .40 S&W cartridge. The next generation of FBI weapons, also produced by Glock, will shoot the 9mm Parabellum, and will be branded the Glock 17M and 19M.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and

Explosives (ATF)

ATF is an interesting law enforcement agency because the crimes it investigates are so specialized and specific. They feature prominently in my favorite crime novel, The Friends of Eddie Coyle, by George Higgins. Here’s what you need to know:

  1. Like the FBI, it operates under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.
  2. It investigates and prevents crimes related to: unlawful use, possession, and manufacture of firearms; acts of arson and bombings; the trafficking of alcohol and tobacco products and the tax evasion that accompanies such activity. ATF also regulates interstate commerce and transportation of firearms and explosives.
  3. Much of its operations involve working with local and state law enforcement on task forces, such as the Charlotte Fire Investigation Task Force featured in my first novel, No Hard Feelings.
  4. It is not unusual for ATF to be included in narcotics investigations, since guns and drugs are almost always found together.

Agents and Structure

ATF Special Agents are empowered to conduct investigations and work with local and state police to reduce violent crime across the United States. They have the lead in any federal investigation involving firearms, explosives, or tobacco-related crimes such as cigarette smuggling.

They can also conduct narcotics investigations independently of other agencies like the DEA. Once again, this is a practical empowerment given the fact that criminals and criminal organizations use firearms to defend drugs and the money illegal substances bring.

ATF Industry Operations Investigators (IOIs) conduct routine investigations into the industries regulated by the agency (such as firearms and explosive dealers, manufacturers, and wholesalers).

Field Offices

ATF has field offices in: Atlanta; Baltimore; Boston; Charlotte, North Carolina; Chicago; Columbus, Ohio; Dallas; Denver; Detroit; Houston; Kansas City, Missouri; Los Angeles; Louisville, Kentucky; Miami; Nashville, Tennessee; New Orleans; New York City; Newark, New Jersey; Philadelphia; Phoenix, Arizona; San Francisco; Seattle; St. Paul, Minnesota; Tampa, Florida; and Washington, D.C.

Duty Weapons

Special agents are equipped with the Glock 22 or Glock 27 handgun as their primary weapon. ATF Special Response Teams (SRTs) also carry Colt M4 assault rifles, among other firearms.

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

The DEA was established in 1973 to fight the global war on drugs. The United States is one of the world’s largest markets for illegal substances. The DEA has 223 offices in the country, as well as 86 offices in other countries.

  1. The DEA is the lead agency for domestic enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act, sharing its jurisdiction and duties with the FBI, ICE, and Homeland Security.
  2. They often work with local and state law enforcement in DEA-led drug task forces.
  3. In 2005, the DEA seized a reported $1.4 billion in drug trade related assets and $477 million worth of drugs.
  4. The DEA also employs an Aviation Division and Special Response Teams (SRTs). SRT missions often involve high-risk arrests, surveillance, arrests of high-profile individuals, witness protection,  breaching, tactical training for local and state police units and teams, and fugitive searches.

Duty Weapons

DEA Special Agents’ primary service weapons include the Glock 17 and Glock 19, the Remington 870 12-gauge shotgun, and Rock River Arms LAR-15 semi-auto carbine.

The United States Marshals Service

I’ve saved my personal favorite federal agency for last. The US Marshals Service is the oldest federal law enforcement agency, dating back to 1789. Marshals are famous for their acts of heroism in the wild west, as they pursued wanted men with posses of deputies.

Today, they serve the 94 federal court districts with approximately 4,000 deputy marshals.

  1. The marshals do not investigate crimes. Their duties include: judicial security and protection, fugitive asset forfeiture, transporting prisoners, operating the WITSEC program, and (as they always have) chasing fugitives and individuals wanted on indictment or by warrant.
  2. They are the most effective federal agency in terms of arrests, with around 350 daily collars.
  3. They often work with local and state law enforcement to apprehend fugitives. Marshals can deputize local LEOs, giving them jurisdiction beyond that of the LEO’s parent agency. For instance, a deputy marshal working with a city police department can deputize an officer. This allows that officer to operate and make an arrest outside the jurisdiction of the city.

Duty Weapons

Deputy marshals carry .40 S&W caliber Glocks, including the Glock 22, 23, and 27. They also carry a backup weapon of their choosing, provided it meets agency standards. Due to the high potential for violent opposition when arresting fugitives, marshals are also equipped with body armor and can wield ballistic shields, helmets, and goggles for the highest risk operations.

Summary

It is every crime author’s responsibility to stay as true to real life law enforcement as the story allows. Readers want it, expect it, and demand it. Fortunately for writers, the subjects of crime and law enforcement are fascinating.

Do your research and choose the right agencies!

If you enjoyed this post, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: crime fiction, how to write crime fiction, law enforcement

How to Write in Free Indirect Style

January 4, 2019 by Michael Santos

Free indirect style is my favorite form of third person point of view. It is a narrative style that combines the benefits of first and third person. Here’s why I prefer to use it in my novels…

But first, if you want more information on Point of View in Stories, don’t miss my full article on the subject.

The advantage of the novel.

Free indirect styleStorytelling can be accomplished through a wide variety of media, and technological advances make that more true with every passing year.

As digital media like television, movies, and streaming services captivate audiences today, you might wonder how and why the novel has survived. The reason is that every medium has its advantages over the others.

The novel uniquely allows writers to explore the internal conflicts of characters.

A television show or movie can’t deliver the thoughts of a character without voice over or clever graphics. Visual media has other advantages over the written word, but books are the best for bringing us close to the deepest levels of a fictional person.

That is why they remain such popular and powerful methods of storytelling.

First person point of view and internal conflict.

First person has many benefits (which I detail in my article on Point of View in Stories). Chief among them is the ability to maximize the advantage of the novel—that is, the closeness between the reader and the characters’ inner lives.

This point of view gives us a narrator who is a character intimately involved in the events of the story. We see those events, the other characters, and the fictional world through the perspective of that character.

And we become keenly familiar with their internal conflicts over the course of the book.

First person is therefore an ideal choice for its immediacy and its narrow field of focus on the psyche and emotional journey of the protagonist, which is the main advantage of the novel as a storytelling medium.

But it also has its limitations.

There are stories that call for more perspectives than that of just one character. First person restricts us to one narrator, because adding multiple first person narrators is clunky and confusing for the reader.

This begs the question, Is there a narrative style that can deliver the closeness of first person with the flexibility to switch viewpoint characters?

Free indirect style explained.

Third person is the most popular POV in fiction today. It allows the author to have more flexibility and to switch between viewpoints, usually with simple scene and chapter breaks.

However, third person’s limitation is that it creates more narrative distance between the reader and the characters.

Luckily, free indirect style was created to solve this problem. It is a combination of first and third person, with both the intimacy and immediacy of first, and also the flexibility of third.

There are two narrative entities in free indirect style: the third person narrator (the writer) and the character (or multiple characters, if you rotate between them with scene breaks).

The characters “speak” their thoughts directly to the reader in the narration. Instead of the author’s voice on the page, the reader hears the characters’ voices.

Functionally, free indirect style works exactly the same way that first person does. The reader enjoys direct contact with the characters, which creates that same deep interaction with the internal conflicts of the people in the story. However, the writer is still using third person, so they can switch between viewpoints at will.

Elmore Leonard, my favorite author, was the master of this technique. Read his classic crime novel, Get Shorty, for a clinic on how to use free indirect style.

How I use free indirect style.

Or check out my novels. Free indirect style forms the basis and foundation of my narrative prose. I love writing in my characters’ voices.

They are lowlife scumbags, who come up with ill-fated schemes to make illicit fortunes. Then there are the law enforcement professionals tasked with catching those crooks. My own narrative voice is NOT more interesting than theirs. How could it be?

So, I set every scene in the perspective of a character. The narration in that scene comes directly from that person, in their voice. The reader doesn’t hear me at all.

As a reader, I find free indirect style to be the most immersive POV, because it lets me forget that an author is involved in the book. I feel like I’m with the characters, without a writer in between us. They give me their thoughts in real time, as we encounter the story together.

An example.

Here’s a passage from my second novel, Mr. Moneybags. It is set in the viewpoint of a character named Reggie, a twenty-four-year-old car thief. Note that the narration is in his voice. It utilizes his rhythms of speech, his ideas of correct grammar, and his turns of phrase…not mine.

Reggie half listened to Tommy on the way to the airport in the dead of night. Half listened as they rolled their beat-up ’99 Chevy Lumina through rows of parked cars in the lot farthest from the terminals and with the least amount of security, Tommy saying this place wasn’t bad for finding cars. If you were careful. Like the time Butch’d had him steal a Mercedes S-Class, the big silver one on the showroom floor, by the windows. Reggie thought that was all well and good, but the lot didn’t have an M6 tonight, and then he saw the yellow LEDs of an airport cop pulling in for his shift. Meant they couldn’t linger without drawing suspicion. So, what good had Tommy’s story done them?


They checked the South Park area next. Reggie half listened some more, as Tommy told him the SouthPark Mall was a decent spot during the day, but not now. Reggie wanted to ask, Then why were they there, if it was pointless at night? But didn’t, preferring to get himself ready, man, get hyped up for doing the job and proving himself, not just hearing Tommy go on and on about how great he was.

We get Reggie directly telling us his thoughts about the job, the present situation, and his rival on the auto-theft crew, Tommy. I’m not narrating this section…Reggie is.

That is the power of free indirect style.

Summary.

Let’s review:

  1. The novel is the best storytelling medium for examining the internal life of a character.
  2. First person point of view brings us closest to a character’s internal state, but limits us to one narrator.
  3. Third person point of view gives us the flexibility to switch narrators, but distances the reader from the characters.
  4. Free indirect style combines the advantages of first and third person, while also eliminating the disadvantages. The reader is close to the characters, but the author can switch viewpoints with a scene or chapter break.
  5. Narration in free indirect style uses the viewpoint character’s voice, not the author’s.

If you enjoyed this article, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: books, how to write a book, how to write crime fiction, writing tips

Story Writing: The Five Essentials of Plot Structure

December 27, 2018 by Michael Santos

In this article, we begin a look at story structure by exploring the five essential building blocks of any plot. Every story, no matter its genre, must have these five components.

Writing that is missing even one of these simply does not work as a story and won’t resonate with readers.

The Inciting Incident

This scene begins the story and hooks the reader. Without a compelling inciting incident, there is no motivation for anyone to continue beyond the opening of your story. If this scene is lackluster, they’ll just put the book down.

The inciting incident changes the protagonist’s life. It upsets the status quo and presents them with a situation, challenge, or problem so great that they must take action to face it. That action is the launching point for the rest of the story.

Action or Coincidence?

The scene may be the result of an active choice by the character, such as a cop who chooses to quit the force to become a PI and must begin a new career.

The other option is to have the inciting incident be a coincidence or random happening that impacts the character, such as a homicide detective who gets called to the scene of a new murder.

No matter what you write, the inciting incident must prompt your character to take action.

The promise of genre.

Inherent in your choice will be the promise that your genre makes to the reader. For instance, when a homicide detective is called out to a crime scene, the reader understands that the story ahead is a murder mystery.

The opening promises them the experience that will follow, and so the beginning must correspond to the experience that the middle and end of the book deliver.

The ending has to pay off the inciting incident in a surprising way. It must tie back to the event that began the story.

In a murder mystery that opens with the arrival of a new case on the detective’s desk, the middle of the story will contain the progression of that case, and the ending must resolve it for the story to be satisfying.

In that way, inciting incidents define the whole concept for your story.

For example, when I defined the concept for my second novel, Mr. Moneybags, I boiled the premise down to this short pitch, which also describes what happens in the book’s inciting incident scene:

A retired armed-robber gets back into the game when his old partner shares her idea to kidnap the boss of a car-theft ring and steal millions from him.

Complications

The middle build portion of the story (the middle 50% of the content) must be full of complications that fuel the story’s external and internal conflicts.

These complications create the twists and turns that keep the story moving forward. They ensure that the reader never gets bored or loses interest.

To do this, you must present your characters (especially your protagonist) with problems of increasing size and importance. The stakes must always be raised, as your characters pursue their conscious wants in the external conflicts and learn the lessons that their subconscious needs to learn in the internal conflicts.

Don’t miss my article on writing compelling external and internal conflicts!

These complications should build in scale until we reach the story’s climax, when the characters face a problem that pushes them to the limits of their humanity.

In most mysteries and thrillers, this will be the life and death conflict when the protagonist and villain finally confront one another.

The Crisis

At this point in the story, the complications have raised the stakes to the point that the character now faces a difficult choice between two bad options. This creates a crisis situation.

Their decision one way or the other will tell the reader a lot about them, making this kind of scene an excellent opportunity to showcase the character’s development.

The two options must both threaten the character with negative consequences. There can be no obvious victory in sight.

An example.

I’ll use my first novel, No Hard Feelings, as an example. My protagonist, a hit man called The Apostle, is on the run from the police and from a pair of criminals who want to kill him after he crossed them. One of those criminals catches him and makes a deal…if The Apostle will murder a detective who is causing trouble for the crooks, his previous sins will be forgiven.

If The Apostle says no, he’ll be shot on the spot. If he says yes, however, he’ll have to go through with the hit, meaning that the entire police force will be out for vengeance. He might be able to run, but his life will likely be over anyway.

Which is the better of the two bad choices? His decision tells the reader who he is, what he values, and demonstrates how he has developed to that point.

What does he choose? Nice try, but you’ll have to read the book to find out!

Remember, the best of two bad choices.

The key to writing a compelling crisis is to make it a truly difficult decision. Neither option can be good. The character must be trapped.

The choice will change their life in such a way that there will never be a way for them to undo the consequences of their actions.

The Climax

Let’s get back to the climax of the story. It follows the largest crisis your character faces.

The climactic scene is the one in which your character acts on the choice they make in the crisis.

After an inciting incident that hooks the reader, complications in the middle build that keep the reader engaged, and a harrowing choice between two bad options in the crisis, the climax is the emotional peak of the story.

It must also pay off your characters’ arcs. If your characters change throughout the story (as they should, if you have internal conflicts in place), then the decision they would have made at the beginning of the story should be different from the decision they do make at the end.

This difference in choice shows the reader how much the characters have developed during their arcs. This is especially crucial for your protagonist. Many contemporary thrillers have multiple prominent characters, however, so you may need to consider the arcs of multiple people.

Climaxes in crime fiction.

In a mystery, the writer must also deliver the answer to the puzzle, keeping in mind that the reader should have all of the clues that they need to solve it BEFORE this scene.

In a thriller, the sensations of dread and impending doom must be at their highest levels in this scene, in order to maximize the suspense.

For more information on writing mysteries and thrillers, read my posts on those subjects.

Resolution

This last component of the story allows the reader to understand the effects of the climax on the external and internal narratives.

There are two crucial factors to consider in your resolution…

  1. Don’t make it corny or cliche. Your first idea for the resolution has been done before…trust me. So spend time thinking about how to conclude your story, because the first thing that pops into your head won’t be original enough.
  2. Don’t review content the reader has already seen. For instance, don’t make the resolution a conversation rehashing the events of the climax. The reader will lose interest, and the ending won’t be satisfying.

Resolutions in commercial and literary fiction.

Here’s a trick to help you. If you’re a commercial fiction author writing in a popular genre, chances are your climax will focus on the external narrative. In a murder mystery, it will be the epic conclusion of the investigation, as the detective confronts the perpetrator in a life and death struggle.

If you are a literary fiction writer, the climax will likely focus on the internal narrative, in which the character will undergo their most dramatic change after their entire internal identity, worldview, and/or sense of morality have been called into question.

In either case, your resolution should center around the narrative that the climax did NOT handle.

The commercial novel’s resolution should explore the character’s internal change in the aftermath of the story. The literary novel’s resolution should show the reader how the external circumstances have changed as a result of the character’s development.

By handling it this way, you avoid reviewing story content that you’ve already delivered. Instead, you fulfill the cathartic reading experience by completing both narratives with satisfying pay offs.

In my crime novels, the climaxes resolve the major external conflicts between the characters. There are often outbreaks of gun play, quick-witted verbal slings and arrows, and the question of who will walk away with the money (and their lives).

My resolutions, then, resolve the internal narratives. Do the characters get what they subconsciously needed all along?

The power of ironic resolutions.

One way to make your endings memorable is to make them ironic. That is, the characters may see a positive outcome in the external narrative but not in the internal, or vice versa.

For instance, what if the detective has to do something that brings their sense of morality into question in order to catch the killer? So, in the end, the external conflict resolves in their favor (they get what they consciously want), but now they must deal with the aftermath of their choice to sacrifice their values.

They can’t undo the consequences of their choice (a crisis of conscience), so they must live with those consequences long after the killer is behind bars.

External victory, internal turmoil–this contradiction makes ironic endings interesting. These are the resolutions that are most likely to stick with a reader after they finish the book.

Summary

  1. The five essentials of plot structure are the inciting incident, middle complications, crisis, climax, and resolution.
  2. The inciting incident must change the protagonist’s status quo, prompt the character to take action, and hook the reader. It can also be used to define the concept of your story.
  3. Middle complications are the twists and turns that keep the reader engaged and that raise the stakes for the characters. They cause the external plot to move forward and the internal arcs to develop.
  4. The crisis presents the protagonist with a choice between two bad options. There is no easy way out, no happy ending in sight.
  5. The climax occurs when the character acts on their choice, when the stakes are at their highest.
  6. Finally, the resolution lets the reader digest the story. If the climax focused on the external narrative, the resolution will conclude the internal narrative, and vice versa. Ironic resolutions are the most memorable.

If you enjoyed this article and found it helpful, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: how to write a book, how to write crime fiction, writing

How to Write a Thriller: The Keys to Suspenseful Writing

December 22, 2018 by Michael Santos

In this article, we begin discussing thriller novels by talking about suspense. How do we create suspense? How does it work within a crime novel to create a satisfying experience for readers?

Be sure to watch my YouTube video on this subject as well.

It’s all about mood.

The label “thriller” encompasses a wide variety of fiction. In terms of popular genres, you’re likely familiar with legal thrillers, psychological thrillers, historical thrillers, and many more.

It is one of the most versatile types of book, because any story can contain elements of a thriller. That is to say, any story can be thrilling. As a result, they are incredibly fun to write, because thriller authors have a great deal of freedom in terms of subject matter, story structure, and the mechanics of the creative writing craft.

The key to every thriller is having the right mood, which demands that you create suspense for the reader.

How do we write with suspense?

I define good suspense as a combination of excitement and apprehension. I want to be desperate to know what happens next in the book, but I also want to experience a sense of dread.

You have to make the reader worry about the outcome of the story. Each new plot point has to change the game in such a way that the reader says, “Uh-oh, now what?” You should make your reader hope for a happy ending but fear impending doom for the characters.

The narrative in a thriller is built on layers of twists and turns that create both excitement and apprehension. Each layer changes the status quo in such a way that the reader senses the tension building, which makes them wonder when that tension will become too much. They instinctively know that the story can’t go on like that forever.

These layers build to an ending that pays off those feelings, arguably the most important part of a thriller–the end is the most cathartic stage of the reading experience, when the emotions are at their peak.

Writing with suspense entails creating, managing, and escalating that sense of impending disaster, as the narrative progresses from its inciting incident to the climax, at which point the protagonist’s life will be irrevocably changed.

There will either be a happy ending (what the reader hopes for), a negative ending (what the reader dreads), or a mix of the two. Perhaps an FBI agent catches the serial killer, but must compromise her personal values and identity to do so. Those complicated resolutions are the ones that will resonate with readers the most, because they keep you thinking long after you finish the novel.

The resolution in a thriller must be both surprising and inevitable. It must shock the reader. At the same time, when the reader considers the story in retrospect, the ending must make complete sense. With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, they should feel like they should have seen the end coming all along.

Thrillers are built on hope.

To write a compelling thriller, you must manage the reader’s hope and fear. But how?

One of my favorite techniques is dramatic irony, when the reader knows more than the characters.

The most common example of this is found in horror movies, when a clueless character goes down into the dark basement. The viewer knows that the monster is down there, ready to rip asunder the poor soul’s head. But the character believes they’re making the right decision.

This creates a powerful sense of impending doom. We hope that they survive, but we dread the likely possibility that we’ll be saying goodbye to this character in a matter of seconds.

Another example…

In my first novel, No Hard Feelings, my protagonist–a hit man named The Apostle–believes the woman he’s seeing has betrayed him to the police and to a group of criminals, who want revenge for a crime he committed against them.

Chapter 11 opens with the woman–Eve–driving home from a date with another man, a detective no less. She’s feeling positive after meeting with him. The next scene shows The Apostle breaking into her apartment, where he plans to confront her about her alleged treachery. He’s irate, hurt, and desperate. And he’s a professional killer.

Eve has no idea that he’s waiting for her, but the reader does.

When you get to that scene, you hope that their encounter will end peaceably. But you dread more negative outcomes.

That’s how dramatic irony works. It plays on the reader’s hope and fear.

Hope is built on good characterization.

It is essential that your reader connects with the characters for this to work. It is required, or your thriller will be less than satisfactory and contain no emotional power whatsoever.

Read It, by Stephen King–a masterpiece of characterization. We get to know the Losers’ Club by seeing the intricacies of their dreams, apprehensions, and lives as both children and adults. The horror plot points in the novel are compelling and terrifying, because we become close enough to the characters for us to feel their dread along with them.

We hope and fear because they do, and King’s skill in creating and developing engaging characters is the key to that.

How to write characters that resonate with readers.

This subject is worthy of its own post (or series of posts), but I’ll keep it simple in this article.

Thrillers are known for their action-packed plots. In any story, there is an external narrative and an internal narrative. The thriller genre is driven by the external; that is, the events of the story–the conflict surrounding the characters.

But it’s the internal narrative, the conflict within the characters, that binds the reader to them on a human level. The internal conflict speaks to a human experience that we’ve all had or will have.

What makes this even more interesting is that it’s common for the reader to know what a character’s internal conflict is…but often the character does not. They typically learn it by the end, in a moment of revelation. “I thought I wanted x, but I needed y all along.”

The internal narrative also enhances our experience with the external narrative, because it adds to the plot’s stakes.

For example, let’s go back to that FBI agent/serial killer bit. The agent’s external objective is straight-forward: they want to solve the case. The plot of the novel will be built on that objective, as we follow the agent’s progress.

But what about the internal objective? Perhaps the FBI agent must solve this case to make up for some horrible thing they did in their past. Now the stakes are much higher. It’s not just a story about stopping a serial killer. The protagonist’s entire sense of self and subconscious journey for redemption now rides on the outcome of the case.

We’ve all experienced a time in life when we sought redemption, so we relate to that story. We hope that it resolves in the agent’s favor, because if they can find redemption, surely so can we. But we dread the negative ending, because we feel the same doom as the character.

For more information about external and internal conflicts, read the full article on how to use them effectively in your story writing.

Back to No Hard Feelings.

In my novel, The Apostle faces two tremendous conflicts in the scene where he breaks into Eve’s apartment.

The external conflict: he’s on the run from the police and a gang, and the woman he loves may have sold him out. The internal conflict: his father used to mercilessly beat him as a punishment. He became a hit man, a professional murderer, so that he would always be the most dangerous person in the room. So that no one could ever hurt him again.

The fact that the woman he loves is likely hurting him is too much for him to handle. It brings him back to his childhood, when another loved one caused him emotional (and physical) pain. He constructed his whole adult persona to avoid such torture, and now that persona is failing him.

He must find the truth about Eve for the sake of his sense of self, his identity, and his ability to find peace. All of which adds to the stakes of the external events in the chapter.

Because of that strong internal narrative, the reader feels connected to him and is more invested in the outcome of the scene. On top of that, the reader has spent enough time with Eve by this point in the story (chapter 11, remember) to know what her internal conflicts are.

When the two characters are in a scene of conflict together, the reader desperately hopes they’ll find happiness, while also dreading the opposite. In short, the chapter is suspenseful because it resonates with the reader on a human level.

Summary.

Okay, let’s review. To write a good thriller:

  1. You must write with suspense.
  2. Suspense is a combination of excitement and apprehension, hope and fear.
  3. Dramatic irony is a great technique for creating suspense.
  4. You must get your readers to connect with your characters for them to feel hope and fear.
  5. To make that happen, write compelling internal narratives that add to the stakes of your plots.

If you enjoyed this post and found it helpful, please share it!

Subscribe to my author newsletter for a free book and more writing and crime fiction content!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: creative writing, crime fiction, how to write a book, how to write a thriller, how to write crime fiction, no hard feelings, suspense novels, thriller novels

Copyright © 2025 · Author Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in