• Skip to main content

Michael Santos

The official website of crime fiction author Michael Santos.

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • BCP Journal
  • Articles
  • Contact

writing tips

How to Find an Idea for Your Novel or Story

August 14, 2019 by Michael Santos

How to find an idea for a book or a story is a question posed to virtually every author, both by interested readers and by aspiring writers.

In this post, I’ll tell you how I work, and pass on the advice that has helped me the most.

Write what you want to know.

Conventional wisdom is to write about what you know. You’ve probably seen this catchy phrase on other writing sites, or heard authors and teachers utter it. Many would have you search for story ideas in your experiences, in the knowledge that you currently possess.

In my opinion, that advice isn’t wrong . . . but it’s not right, either.

Starting out, when I deliberately tried to write about what I knew, I was too bored by my ideas to continue beyond a few chapters. Nothing held my attention, because I hadn’t let my curiosity lead the way.

Instead, ask yourself, “What if?”

Creative writing is not like journalism, historical writing, technical writing, or any other fact-based content. Even as I write this post, I approach the task from a different angle than I would a piece of fiction.

That’s because ideas in fiction do not come from asking, “What is?”

As fiction writers, we ask, “What if?”

We’re always asking that question, including in our daily lives. We take in information and find connections between seemingly unrelated things. Taking a couple of facts and turning them upside-down or spinning them in a new way is a source of amusement to the creative writer.

More than that, it’s fulfilling, satisfying.

How to get an idea from “What if?”

What are you curious or passionate about? Which subject interests you enough to research it and then explore its possibilities through the experiences of fictional characters?

What if a priest and a rabbi really did walk into a bar, and it wasn’t a joke? What if the sky did fall?

What if someone pays a hitman a substantial amount of money to commit a different kind of crime? And what if, outside of his comfort zone, he makes a mistake and angers his vengeful client? This became my first novel, No Hard Feelings.

What if two armed-robbers plan to steal from a powerful crime boss, and go so far as to kidnap him? What if, instead of coming to his rescue, the crime boss’s underlings decide they want the money for themselves? There you have my second novel, Mr. Moneybags.

What if a teenage boy, seemingly destined for a career as a stock car driver, gave up his dream of racing to become a U.S. Marshal, after his father was murdered? What if, as a marshal, he now learns the identity of the killers and has the means (and the bullets) to chase them down? Those questions became my third novel, Mean Bones.

I always begin with a character and a situation. The situation has to be something I’m interested in, not something I already know. I must be motivated to spend 300-plus pages exploring an idea.

It is the What If’s in life that nourish a writer. So, dig into those questions and be nourished.

Let the characters do the work.

Once you have a situation, create and flesh out characters. When I say “flesh out” I mean really get to know them. Their hopes and their dreams. Their fears, habits, priorities, goals, weaknesses, strengths, routines, etc. When the story opens, what is their status quo?

A story is worth telling if a character’s life is irrevocably changed by what happens. The events and relationships that your characters experience in the novel should push them to their emotional and/or physical limits.

If they make it out alive (I write crime fiction, remember), they will never be the same, either for better or for worse.

Often, you’ll find that the best protagonist is one who personifies the major themes of the story. Keep that in mind as you develop them.

When the characters are well-sketched, drop them into their starting positions and turn them loose. If you know who they are, they’ll direct the story through their interactions. Of course, writers who prefer to outline will start with more concrete plans, where as “pantsers” (myself included) like to sit back and watch the story unfold.

You will always write about what you know.

So, what about that popular phrase I mentioned at the beginning? After all, it’s popular for a reason.

I believe that, because our characters come from us, it is impossible not to write about what we know. Our experiences, thoughts, questions, understanding, empathy, etc. will always come through in the people we create. We don’t have to force it.

I try to never manage my characters. I set them in motion, often in pursuit of the same, mutually exclusive goal, and record what they do. If I know Characters A and B, then I’ll be able to write Character A’s reaction when Character B does or says something dramatic. My stories build one reaction at a time.

The key to getting this far, though, is to write from a standpoint of curiosity. Never stop asking, “What if?”

I think writers are more interested in asking questions than providing answers. Questions are dramatic, answers are not. Questions are dangerous conflicts, answers are safe resolutions. The question is fire, the answer a bucket of cold water that extinguishes the excitement.

The question, not the answer, is the story.

Read in order to write.

It’s also important to maintain your creative health. I have never heard of, read, or met a successful author who was not also a prolific reader. Often, they even have other creative hobbies, outside of the world of books.

It’s crucial for us to recharge our artistic batteries with the work of others.

I enjoy drinking coffee and reading on weekend mornings (or at night before bed, or when I’m waiting somewhere, or at any other waking moment). I also play the bass guitar in a band and write song lyrics. When I need inspiration for my fiction writing, or simply a break and a step back, I grab a book or my bass.

Writers are not assembly lines.

In today’s world of rapid release publishing, that is sometimes difficult to see. Self-care is as important for our creative lives as it is for any other aspect of our existence.

Take a break and recharge. You might be surprised by the ideas that will come.

Use real places for idea inspiration.

Ever visit a city, town, or famous building and think about using it as a story setting?

That is another form of “What if?” question. What if a character encountered an interesting situation at this location?

When I was developing the idea for Mean Bones, I was inspired by the North Carolina mountains and the town of North Wilkesboro. For all my Queen City crime novels, I spend time in Charlotte, where the books are set, and come back to the page, ready to work on the next story.

What are some places of interest to you? The idea you’ve been looking for might be there.

Look at society for an idea.

I would never advocate turning a work of fiction into a preachy manifesto. Your novel shouldn’t be a political brochure or a soap box disguised as a book.

That said, often a story can be derived from an issue or aspect of society that you feel needs to be discussed.

The trick is to make sure the characters represent and personify the social commentary you want to include. Don’t write a treatise. Write a story that proves your point through the events and people involved.

“My idea has to be original!” and other dumb things we tell ourselves.

I’ve seen many aspiring writers become paralyzed by the fact that their idea is not 100 percent original. They feel it’s been done before. They’re convinced they won’t be a real artist unless they redefine what it is to tell a story.

Rookie authors worry about originality. Veteran writers have, somewhere along the way, learned the truth: there is no such thing as an original idea.

Every idea has been done before. You can boil any story you’ve ever encountered down to one of a handful of plot types.

What will be original is your specific execution of an idea. Nobody else on this planet is you, so nobody else can approach a story the same way that you would.

Don’t let the myth of originality stop you from charging ahead. Start your story. Create your characters. Allow your experiences and perspectives to come through in the writing and make an old idea new.

For some reason, this seems to be a trade secret. They ought to teach this in more writing classes.

We are not bigger than the story, the story is bigger than us. Don’t lose sight of that by thinking that you’re an artist. You very well might be one, but the moment you call yourself that, you may as well hang up your pen.

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: creative writing, crime fiction, how to write a book, how to write a story, novels, stories, writing, writing tips

How to Write in Free Indirect Style

January 4, 2019 by Michael Santos

Free indirect style is my favorite form of third person point of view. It is a narrative style that combines the benefits of first and third person. Here’s why I prefer to use it in my novels…

But first, if you want more information on Point of View in Stories, don’t miss my full article on the subject.

The advantage of the novel.

Free indirect styleStorytelling can be accomplished through a wide variety of media, and technological advances make that more true with every passing year.

As digital media like television, movies, and streaming services captivate audiences today, you might wonder how and why the novel has survived. The reason is that every medium has its advantages over the others.

The novel uniquely allows writers to explore the internal conflicts of characters.

A television show or movie can’t deliver the thoughts of a character without voice over or clever graphics. Visual media has other advantages over the written word, but books are the best for bringing us close to the deepest levels of a fictional person.

That is why they remain such popular and powerful methods of storytelling.

First person point of view and internal conflict.

First person has many benefits (which I detail in my article on Point of View in Stories). Chief among them is the ability to maximize the advantage of the novel—that is, the closeness between the reader and the characters’ inner lives.

This point of view gives us a narrator who is a character intimately involved in the events of the story. We see those events, the other characters, and the fictional world through the perspective of that character.

And we become keenly familiar with their internal conflicts over the course of the book.

First person is therefore an ideal choice for its immediacy and its narrow field of focus on the psyche and emotional journey of the protagonist, which is the main advantage of the novel as a storytelling medium.

But it also has its limitations.

There are stories that call for more perspectives than that of just one character. First person restricts us to one narrator, because adding multiple first person narrators is clunky and confusing for the reader.

This begs the question, Is there a narrative style that can deliver the closeness of first person with the flexibility to switch viewpoint characters?

Free indirect style explained.

Third person is the most popular POV in fiction today. It allows the author to have more flexibility and to switch between viewpoints, usually with simple scene and chapter breaks.

However, third person’s limitation is that it creates more narrative distance between the reader and the characters.

Luckily, free indirect style was created to solve this problem. It is a combination of first and third person, with both the intimacy and immediacy of first, and also the flexibility of third.

There are two narrative entities in free indirect style: the third person narrator (the writer) and the character (or multiple characters, if you rotate between them with scene breaks).

The characters “speak” their thoughts directly to the reader in the narration. Instead of the author’s voice on the page, the reader hears the characters’ voices.

Functionally, free indirect style works exactly the same way that first person does. The reader enjoys direct contact with the characters, which creates that same deep interaction with the internal conflicts of the people in the story. However, the writer is still using third person, so they can switch between viewpoints at will.

Elmore Leonard, my favorite author, was the master of this technique. Read his classic crime novel, Get Shorty, for a clinic on how to use free indirect style.

How I use free indirect style.

Or check out my novels. Free indirect style forms the basis and foundation of my narrative prose. I love writing in my characters’ voices.

They are lowlife scumbags, who come up with ill-fated schemes to make illicit fortunes. Then there are the law enforcement professionals tasked with catching those crooks. My own narrative voice is NOT more interesting than theirs. How could it be?

So, I set every scene in the perspective of a character. The narration in that scene comes directly from that person, in their voice. The reader doesn’t hear me at all.

As a reader, I find free indirect style to be the most immersive POV, because it lets me forget that an author is involved in the book. I feel like I’m with the characters, without a writer in between us. They give me their thoughts in real time, as we encounter the story together.

An example.

Here’s a passage from my second novel, Mr. Moneybags. It is set in the viewpoint of a character named Reggie, a twenty-four-year-old car thief. Note that the narration is in his voice. It utilizes his rhythms of speech, his ideas of correct grammar, and his turns of phrase…not mine.

Reggie half listened to Tommy on the way to the airport in the dead of night. Half listened as they rolled their beat-up ’99 Chevy Lumina through rows of parked cars in the lot farthest from the terminals and with the least amount of security, Tommy saying this place wasn’t bad for finding cars. If you were careful. Like the time Butch’d had him steal a Mercedes S-Class, the big silver one on the showroom floor, by the windows. Reggie thought that was all well and good, but the lot didn’t have an M6 tonight, and then he saw the yellow LEDs of an airport cop pulling in for his shift. Meant they couldn’t linger without drawing suspicion. So, what good had Tommy’s story done them?


They checked the South Park area next. Reggie half listened some more, as Tommy told him the SouthPark Mall was a decent spot during the day, but not now. Reggie wanted to ask, Then why were they there, if it was pointless at night? But didn’t, preferring to get himself ready, man, get hyped up for doing the job and proving himself, not just hearing Tommy go on and on about how great he was.

We get Reggie directly telling us his thoughts about the job, the present situation, and his rival on the auto-theft crew, Tommy. I’m not narrating this section…Reggie is.

That is the power of free indirect style.

Summary.

Let’s review:

  1. The novel is the best storytelling medium for examining the internal life of a character.
  2. First person point of view brings us closest to a character’s internal state, but limits us to one narrator.
  3. Third person point of view gives us the flexibility to switch narrators, but distances the reader from the characters.
  4. Free indirect style combines the advantages of first and third person, while also eliminating the disadvantages. The reader is close to the characters, but the author can switch viewpoints with a scene or chapter break.
  5. Narration in free indirect style uses the viewpoint character’s voice, not the author’s.

If you enjoyed this article, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: books, how to write a book, how to write crime fiction, writing tips

Story Writing: Verb Tenses

January 2, 2019 by Michael Santos

In this article, we explore verb tenses in fiction writing.

A verb is what somebody or something does. The tense of a verb tells us when the action is taken. The person of a verb lets us know who is taking the action.

Which verb tense is right for your story? Read on to find out.

Verb tense (when the action happens).

You’ll have to choose between past tense and present tense. Both come with their advantages. Additionally, certain genres will have preferences toward one or the other. Of course, that doesn’t mean you have to follow those preferences, but you may wish to if you are a fan of the genre in which you’re writing.

Present tense.

Let’s start with present tense, because it is currently (as of this writing) trending in the crime genre, especially in murder mysteries featuring a detective or detective inspector protagonist.

Authors who prefer present tense often say that it creates high immediacy. Present tense makes it feel like the story is happening “right now.” The effect is magnified when you combine present tense with first person narration, which also heightens immediacy.

I take a shortcut down a dark alley, feel a gun against my spine. A voice says, “Give me your wallet.”

This can be ideal for any type of fiction, but it especially explains the appeal of this tense with today’s genre writers, who write novels that prioritize the external narrative and effects like suspense. For an excellent novel in first person present tense, read the classic legal thriller Presumed Innocent, by Scott Turow.

A personal note to snobs.

I have heard some authors (those who would debate the terms artist and storyteller) suggest that present tense is popular with commercial fiction writers today because it is simple. It keeps the timeline of events in a story streamlined and easy to manage. The implication is that commercial writers can’t handle more complicated narratives, so they deliberately “limit” themselves.

As a commercial author, I’m tempted to respond to that opinion using language favored by my criminal characters and their lowlife vocabularies.

But I won’t. I’ll just say that the assertion that present tense is for “simple” fiction and “simple” writers is ironic. Despite the current trends, in my market research I have discovered that a large number of crime readers find present tense inherently pretentious.

To be honest, I’ve always felt that way, myself. When I read present tense, it sounds too “writerly,” which reminds me that I’m reading and breaks my immersion.

Other commercial readers love present tense, however, and it falls to every writer to determine which tense is better for their project. Many acclaimed genre authors, such as Michael Connelly, have been known to use both of these verb tenses in the same novel. Perhaps the protagonist’s passages are in first person present tense, but the antagonist’s are in third person past. His novel The Poet makes use of that combination very well.

It’s your choice.

Don’t let snobs affect your decision.

Past tense.

While it’s true that present tense is enjoying a spike in appeal among today’s authors, past tense remains the more popular of the two.

Stories have traditionally been written in the past tense, going all the way back to the classics. As a result, it is the more natural tense for storytelling with the written word. For many readers, our mental ears have a kind of trained familiarity with past tense narration.

He took a shortcut down a dark alley, felt a gun against his spine. A voice said, “Give me your wallet.”

As a result, it actually has much the same immediacy as present tense. Despite the verb tense telling us that the events are past, we still feel them in the narrative present. This is especially true when you combine past tense with limited third person narration, which closes the distance to the characters and delivers even more immediacy.

Past tense also allows flexibility for the author to seamlessly play with the timeline. It’s easier to include flashback sections in a past tense narrative. In fact, for a novel that utilizes present tense in the main narrative, it is often optimal to switch to past for any sections that jump around in time.

My opinion, for what it’s worth.

Combine the natural, familiar feel of past tense with its ability to reach the same levels of immediacy as present tense and the additional flexibility it gives your narrative timeline.

That’s why I prefer past tense, not only as a writer, but as a reader too.

However, that’s only my opinion. Once again, choose the tense that will create the effect you desire.

Verb person.

For an extensive look into the options available for verb person, read my article, “Point of View in Stories”.

Summary.

To review:

  1. Choose between present and past tense.
  2. Present tense is trending right now, due to its immediacy and its focused approach to the narrative timeline.
  3. Past tense remains the more popular of the two, because of its familiar quality, a similar (if not the same) level of immediacy when combined with the most popular verb person (limited third), and the flexibility it lends to your story’s timeline.

If you enjoyed this article, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Check out my Queen City Crime Series, available on Amazon in Kindle Ebook and print paperback.

No Hard Feelings

No Hard Feelings

Mr. Moneybags

Mean Bones

Get more writing and crime fiction content!

A FREE ebook copy of No Hard Feelings and even more great content is yours, when you join my email newsletter. Subscribe below!

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: creative writing, how to write, how to write a book, writing tips

Point of View in Stories

December 30, 2018 by Michael Santos

In this article we’ll discuss the different point of view (POV) options available to writers, how to execute them, and the benefits/drawbacks of each.

What is point of view?

Point of view is the technical term for the vantage point the writer uses to tell the story.

The reader experiences scenes through the perspective of that person, who is either the author or the viewpoint character. This means that you, the writer, can use your own narrative voice or you can tell the story through your characters.

Choosing the right POV for your project is one of the most crucial decisions that will make or break a work. The choice will ultimately depend on the effect you want to create for the reader.

Common types of point of view.

In this section, I’ll give you brief descriptions of the major types of point of view, and we’ll explore some of them in greater detail later on.

First person.

Dark AlleyIn this point of view, the story is told by the narrator, a character who is deeply involved in the story and relays their perspective with “I”.

I took a shortcut down a dark alley, felt a gun against my spine. A voice said to me, “Take out your wallet.”

One crucial element to remember is that first person point of view is limited to the knowledge, experience, and perception of the narrator. We can only tell the reader information that the character already has. The thoughts of other characters are off-limits.

We can, however, tell the reader what the narrator believes other characters are thinking. But we must stay in the mind and voice of our narrator, alone.

This is perhaps the most natural and intuitive POV to use, and will often be the best choice for beginning writers. Why? When we tell stories in day to day life, we almost always use first person, going all the way back to when we were children.

“How was your day, honey?”

“Great. I got an A in Spanish.”

Keep in mind that first person narration is not in the author’s voice. There is a character narrating the story, so it must be the character’s voice on the page.

This means that we have to pay attention to that person’s sentence structure, vocabulary, and rhythms of speech when writing the narration in the book.

First person remains a popular point of view in all styles of fiction, both commercial and literary.

Advantages and disadvantages of first person POV.

The main advantages are:

  1. First person is an intuitive voice for writers to produce and for readers to consume.
  2. It creates intimacy and immediacy. First person narration is the absolute closest in narrative distance that we, as readers, can get to a fictional character. We share the narrator’s thoughts, feelings, and views of the world. And, the events in the story are presented in real time—we are right there with the character in every scene.
  3. Closeness builds trust. If your story focuses on the trials and tribulations of a main protagonist, especially if that character undergoes immense internal change, the close narrative distance of first-person will heighten the impact of the story on the reader. In short, it helps connect the reader to the character. Other forms of POV can do this too, of course, but first person is excellent in this regard.

Some disadvantages:

  1. Limiting yourself to one character’s perspective can restrict your options as a storyteller. You won’t be able to enter the perspective of any other characters with first person. In some stories, there isn’t a need to. However, some forms of fiction, like thrillers, can benefit from switching between characters. Your choice of POV should factor that in.

Second person.

In this point of view, the narrator refers to the reader as “you”.

You take a shortcut down a dark alley, feel a gun against your spine. A voice says to you, “Take out your wallet.”

I won’t go into too much detail on this POV, because it is very rare for novelists to use it. My opinion is that second person can be more effective in short-form writing, but in long-form it is difficult to execute effectively.

As a reader, second person annoys me after awhile. I can’t help thinking, “No, narrator, you’re not talking about me…it’s the character.”

Third person.

This point of view means that the story is told from a narrative distance. There are several types of third person, so let’s break down each one.

Types of third person POV.

Third person is the most versatile point of view, especially in contemporary fiction. You can choose from the following:

Limited third person.

For limited third, the viewpoint character is “he” or “she,” and is directly involved in the events of the story. As with first person, we are limited to the perspective of that character and can’t divulge anything to the reader that our viewpoint character does not think, feel, or perceive.

This creates the same intimacy and immediacy that we get with first person point of view, resulting in a strong connection between the reader and the character.

However, limited third person comes with an advantage over first person…we can easily switch viewpoint characters with a scene or chapter break.

He took a shortcut down the dark alley, felt a gun against his spine. A voice said to him, “Take out your wallet.”

***

She pressed the .38 into his flesh, her finger over the trigger.

In this short example, we return to the same situation we’ve seen before. This time, we see the differences between the two viewpoint characters’ perspectives in the scene.

The man feels a gun (he doesn’t know what kind) against his back and hears a voice. We then have a scene break and enter his assailant’s viewpoint. She knows exactly what kind of gun it is (a .38 revolver) because it’s her weapon. She also feels her own finger over the trigger, so her viewpoint gives us that detail as well.

By using limited third, we’re able to seamlessly switch viewpoint characters to give the reader multiple angles of the situation, with high levels of immediacy. Now, we’re connected to both characters.

Limited third person or first person?

By contrast, having multiple first person narrators is awkward and clumsy.

I took a shortcut down a dark alley, felt a gun against my spine. A voice said to me, “Take out your wallet.”

***

I pressed the .38 into his flesh, my finger over the trigger.

Having two first person viewpoints here creates confusion for the reader, because we can’t distinguish between them. In third person, we can use different pronouns or give the characters’ names. But in first person, we must stick with “I”.

Limited third person delivers the intimacy of first person with the flexibility of a more distant narrative style, allowing us to shift viewpoints. For this reason, it is the most popular point of view in fiction today, especially commercial fiction.

Think about thriller novels, which often have large casts and will shift between the protagonist, the villain, and multiple supporting characters. All of those different perspectives make the storytelling more interesting and exciting for the reader. Third limited makes that possible.

Third person omniscient.

In this point of view, the narrator is the all-knowing author, who sees the story from a greater narrative distance and has access to the thoughts, feelings, and perception of every character.

We can switch between viewpoints easily with third omniscient. Additionally, we can give the reader information that only the storyteller would know. For instance:

John thought this would be the last time he’d see the bloody knife. Ten years later, he’d learn otherwise.

In the moment, John can’t possibly know what will happen ten years from the time he uses that knife to kill someone. But the all-knowing narrator does, and can include that little teaser for the reader without breaking the rules of third omniscient.

It is a very natural storytelling voice to read, since we’ve seen it over and over again since we were young. Children’s stories, folktales, and fables commonly use this POV.

Stephen King is the contemporary author I recommend studying to learn this technique—especially his novel, It. King himself is the narrator, and most of the book employs a close narrative distance to the characters. He even switches to first person and limited third in various sections.

However, he’ll also include some ominous lines that only the omniscient narrator could know. When the Losers’ Club are still children, for instance, he’ll tease the horrific events they’ll encounter as adults.

The resulting effect is a mood of impending doom and mystery that is perfect for horror fiction.

Advantages and disadvantages.

The advantages are many:

  1. This is the most flexible point of view, giving us the most liberty in our storytelling. We can follow any character at any time, discuss anyone’s thoughts, and even introduce events that are yet to occur.
  2. Once again, it is a very natural voice for the reader to hear. We’re all familiar with stories told by an all-knowing narrator, and it is easy to become immersed in this point of view when it is done correctly.
  3. Like third limited, we have the opportunity to deeply connect with multiple characters, because we can see inside their psyches. The difference is that third limited requires a scene or chapter break to signal a change in viewpoint, whereas third omniscient does not.

There are a couple of key disadvantages:

  1. It is the hardest point of view to use. This makes sense, because with greater freedom comes greater labor. Yes, we can follow any character at any time, discuss anyone’s thoughts, and even introduce events that are yet to occur. But that involves managing a tremendous amount of moving pieces.
  2. The narrative distance is greater than in both first person and limited third. While we can still close that distance by telling the reader the most intimate thoughts of the characters, third omniscient can’t accomplish the same level of immediacy as those other two POVs. This can be a benefit, depending on the desired effect you want to create.

Summary.

To review:

  1. The most common POVs in fiction today are: first person, limited third person, and third person omniscient.
  2. In first person, the viewpoint character is “I” and narrates the story from their perspective. It has the highest levels of immediacy and intimacy.
  3. In limited third, the viewpoint character is “he” or “she” and narrates the story from their perspective. It combines the immediacy of first person with a slightly greater narrative distance, making it easy to switch viewpoints with scene and chapter breaks.
  4. In omniscient third, the narrator is all-knowing, and can give the reader any information about the characters and events. It has the lowest immediacy but the highest level of flexibility for the writer.
  5. Second person is worth knowing, but is rarely used in long-form storytelling.

There are even more variations of these points of view, which we will cover in future posts.

  • My article on How to Write in Free Indirect Style

For now, if you liked this article and found it helpful, please share it!

Looking for a new thriller?

Check out my supernatural thriller, The Nowhere Game!

The Nowhere Game

 

Filed Under: On Writing Tagged With: crime fiction, how to write a book, writing, writing tips

Copyright © 2025 · Author Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in